Pages

Showing posts with label religion v science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label religion v science. Show all posts

Friday, June 20, 2008

The Journey from Religion to Science



Summer Session: July 20 - August 10 2008

Summer Session 2008: From Religion to Science

Contemporary society challenges us to understand our world in ways unimaginable a century ago. Scientific and technological advances, although beneficial and intellectually exciting, are also frequently anxiety-provoking, disrupting the placid certainty of the past: our comforting mythologies are regularly challenged by the realities of modern science and the unforeseen capabilities of modern technology. How can we embrace this intellectual excitement without provoking the anxiety created by, to borrow Lippmann's phrase, the "acids of modernity"? How can those of us committed to a fully secular, rational, science-based understanding of the world respond to majority views shaped by different commitments and loyalties? How do we chart a course from the "disenchantment of the world" to the "re-enchantment of the world."

The Center for Inquiry, in its flagship venue in Amherst New York, as well as across the country and abroad, provides educational opportunities that help explain the development of the modern worldview,

particularly the human journey from basing reality on religious beliefs to relying on evidence, inquiry, and evaluation.
The Institute's Summer Session 2008 is a guided tour along this route, raising such questions as, "What are the origins of religion?", "How do we assess the truth claims made by major religions on the basis of their sacred writings?", "Is it possible to be good without God?" and "What is modern science telling us about how we come to know ourselves and the world beyond us?" The courses offered in 2008, organized around the theme From Religion to Science, examine the "future" of the Enlightenment, secular and religious dominion in public policy, the new atheism, and other topics of vital concern for humanists and non-humanists alike.

Schedule

Instruction at The Institute at the Center for Inquiry is organized into modules, each an intensive exploration of some aspect of the theme. Modules are carefully interwoven to convey the richness of the theme as a totality, but they also serve as stand-alone courses. Participants may take one, two, or three modules depending on their sphere of interest.

Anatomy of Religion (July 20-27)

This module is a critical examination of religious texts, ideas and cosmologies. Join us as we look at the influence of religion on private life, public policy, and moral values. Lines of inquiry include:

  • Mythology of the Bible: cosmologies ancient and modern
  • The sources of Christianity
  • The sources of Islam
  • Biblical Ethics
  • Why people are "religious" - views from psychology, sociology and neuroscience

Instructors: Joyce E. Salisbury, Robert M. Price, Ibn Warraq

The Humanist Perspective: Science and Secularism (July 27 - August 3)

The two prongs of humanism are a commitment to reason above faith and the idea that moral values are fundamentally human values which cannot be determined by appeals to supernatural authority. Module B explores both of these aspects as well as their interconnection. Issues explored include:

  • Origins of the scientific worldview
  • Secularism and political life
  • The unfinished projects of the Enlightenment
  • Contemporary issues in secular studies: multisecularism,
  • desecularization and the "new atheism"
  • Mind, body and brain: Humanism and Personhood

Instructors: Ronald Giere, John Kaag, Ronald A. Lindsay, John Shook

Ethics Without Religion: Being, Doing, and Becoming (August 3 - 10)

This module focuses on the relationship between local and global ideas of community, what it means to lead a "good life and the search for sources of wisdom and practical action in a largely post-religious world. Topics include:

  • Applied secular humanism
  • The good life: Eupraxophy
  • Building local communities and world community
  • The possibility of normative ethics

Instructors: Nathan Bupp, John Shook, Jessica Wahman, Judith B. Walker

Sunday, May 25, 2008

We should strive for peaceful co-existence with the mainstream religions.

Scientists divided over alliance with religion

· Rees sees main faiths as help in extremism fight
· Dawkins warns against 'buying into fiction'

Scientists should form a closer alliance with mainstream religion in order to better fight extremism, the president of the Royal Society said yesterday.

Speaking at a debate at the Guardian Hay festival, Martin Rees, the Astronomer Royal who heads the Royal Society, said that science needed as many allies as it could find in the current climate.

"If we give the impression that science is hostile to even mainstream religion, it will be more difficult to combat the kinds of anti-science sentiments that are really important,"
he said.
"We need people like that as allies in dealing with extreme fundamentalism."

His fellow panellists, evolutionists Richard Dawkins and Steve Jones, disagreed. Prof Dawkins said that, though he had cooperated with the recently-retired Bishop of Oxford, Richard Harries, to complain about allowing creationists to set up schools, he urged a limit.

"If we are too friendly to nice, decent bishops, we run the risk of buying into the fiction that there's something virtuous about believing things because of faith rather than because of evidence. We run the risk of betraying scientific enlightenment."

Bishops themselves never killed anybody, but possibly made the world safer for "people who do kill people by extolling the virtues of faith as opposed to reason and evidence".

Prof Jones discussed the problems he comes across when teaching students with Islamic backgrounds.

"To a man and to a woman, there are parts of science they will not accept.

"That means that, in their early lives, they have been told deliberate lies by people who, I'm sure, know they are deliberate lies. I don't care how charming they are, I don't care how pleasant they are, these people are evil.

"What's true for imams is, more or less, true for bishops."

Lord Rees went on to point out potential threats to science. "There are new kinds of extreme views that are separate from religion - there are many strange cults that I find potentially terrifying." He cited the Raelian cult as an example, members of which believe that their leader came from outer space and are attempting to clone humans, saying: "They would say they are on the side of science. People like the Raelians show that we're kidding ourselves if we think that a scientific education makes people rational."

Cults allied to technology in this way could be dangerous. "You can imagine eco-groups who imagine the world would be better off without human beings. We need to combat these new irrationalities and, in doing this we should seek allies wherever we can, and I think allies do include people who call themselves religious.

We should strive for peaceful co-existence with the mainstream religions."